Current:Home > InvestSignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:What do a top-secret CIA mission and the Maryland bridge wreck have in common? Well, the same crane -Capitatum
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center:What do a top-secret CIA mission and the Maryland bridge wreck have in common? Well, the same crane
Poinbank Exchange View
Date:2025-04-05 21:04:02
These days a floating crane called the Chesapeake 1000 — nicknamed “Chessy” — has the grim task of hauling off shattered steel from last week’s fatal bridge collapse in Baltimore.
It has taken on SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Centermany jobs over the decades. But the crane’s most notable operation, until last week, was helping the CIA retrieve part of a sunken Soviet submarine.
WHAT’S THE ORIGIN STORY?
In the early 1970s, the crane barge was called the Sun 800 for the number of tons it could lift. It helped to construct a specialized ship that raised a portion of the sub in 1974. Specifically, the crane hoisted into the ship heavy machinery that was vital to the Cold-War heist.
The equipment included a mechanical claw, tons of steel pipe and a heavy duty hydraulic system. The Soviet submarine was roughly 3 miles (5 kilometers) below the surface of the Pacific.
The CIA wrote on its website that the ship “could conduct the entire recovery under water, away from the view of other ships, aircraft or spy satellites.” The specialized ship was called the Hughes Glomar Explorer, named after the billionaire industrialist Howard Hughes.
To save time, a Philadelphia-area shipyard built the vessel’s heavy parts on the ground. The floating crane was needed to lift those assembled pieces into the new ship.
“The Sun 800 was built specifically to help us on the construction of the Hughes Glomar Explorer,” said Gene Schorsch, who was then chief of hull design for Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Co.
WHAT WAS THE CIA MISSION?
The secret mission was called “Project Azorian.”
News stories in 1975 told of the mission. But Washington didn’t confirm the basic facts until 2010, when the CIA released a partially redacted report that lacked many of the juicy details.
“It’s considered one of the most expensive intelligence operations of all time,” said M. Todd Bennett, a history professor at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina, who wrote a 2022 book on the mission. ”And not only that, it’s certainly one of the most inventive or daring intelligence operations in U.S. history.”
The sub, K-129, was lost northeast of Hawaii in 1968. After the Soviets abandoned their search, the U.S. found the vessel.
“To discover it, that’s one thing,” Bennett said. “But to have the wherewithal to try to devise a way to recover that piece of hardware is really remarkable. It’s been compared — and rightly so — to an underwater moonshot.”
The submarine was a potential wellspring of intelligence, from details on Soviet nuclear-weapons capabilities to military codes.
By 1970, the CIA had devised its plan and hatched a cover story for the ship: A commercial deep-sea mining vessel owned by Hughes.
The agency’s hope was to retrieve a 132-foot (40-meter) section of the sub, which weighed 1,750 tons.
“While maintaining its position in the ocean currents, the ship had to lower the (claw) by adding 60-foot sections of supporting steel pipe, one at a time,” the CIA wrote.
Another piece of machinery assembled for the ship was a special platform. It was used to keep the claw system steady — and on target — in the ocean currents.
“You want the ship to be able to roll or pitch without affecting that pipe,” Schorsch said.
During the mission, the claw grasped the submarine section. But about a third of the way up it broke, allowing part of the sub’s hull to fall away.
Former CIA Director William Colby later wrote that the most valuable aspects of the sub were lost, Bennett said.
The salvage, however, included the bodies of six Soviet sailors, who were given a formal military burial at sea.
DID THEY TRY AGAIN?
A second mission was planned. But journalists broke the story in 1975, led by Seymour Hersh, then writing for The New York Times, and columnist Jack Anderson.
News reports indicated that some manuals may have been recovered, while some of the hull pieces helped the U.S. to refine its estimates of Soviet naval capabilities, Bennett said.
Anderson’s sources told him Project Azorian was too expensive and sapped resources from other intelligence programs, Bennett said.
The submarine also was diesel-powered and generations behind the Soviet’s nuclear-powered subs.
“Anderson’s sources — and Anderson — argued that it was really a museum piece, a relic,” Bennett said.
American media outlets were heavily criticized for reporting on the project, which had a “chilling effect” as news outlets became less willing to disclose intelligence secrets, Bennett said.
WAS THE OPERATION SUCCESSFUL?
The professor said the mission itself was a partial success.
“Sadly the ship itself no longer exists — it was scrapped years ago,” Bennett said. “But it was a significant piece of hardware. And this was a really important mission in U.S. intelligence history, in part because it was one of the first major underwater operations that we were aware of.”
Meanwhile, the crane that helped build the Hughes Glomar Explorer is now often touted as one of the largest of its kind on the East Coast.
Engineering News-Record, a magazine that covers the construction industry, wrote in 2017 that Donjon Marine Co. Inc., bought the Sun 800 in 1993. The salvage company increased the capacity to 1,000 tons and renamed it the Chesapeake 1000 to reflect what it can haul.
Since then, it’s helped to construct bridges and buildings. But few projects have been as urgent as the one in Baltimore. Officials are scrambling to clear shipping channels for one of the East Coast’s busiest ports and to erect a new Francis Scott Key Bridge.
“To go out there and see it up close, you realize just how daunting a task this is,” Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said Friday after the Chesapeake 1000 arrived at the collapsed span. “You realize how difficult the work is ahead of us.”
veryGood! (717)
Related
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- 1000-Lb Sisters' Tammy Slaton Shares Photo of Her Transformation After 180-Pound Weight Loss
- Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
- Ecuador’s High Court Rules That Wild Animals Have Legal Rights
- Paige Bueckers vs. Hannah Hidalgo highlights women's basketball games to watch
- Inside Clean Energy: Here Are 5 States that Took Leaps on Clean Energy Policy in 2021
- Behold the tax free bagel: A New York classic gets a tax day makeover
- DC Young Fly Shares How He Cries All the Time Over Jacky Oh's Death
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- A tech billionaire goes missing in China
Ranking
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- 'Leave pity city,' MillerKnoll CEO tells staff who asked whether they'd lose bonuses
- North Carolina’s Bet on Biomass Energy Is Faltering, With Energy Targets Unmet and Concerns About Environmental Justice
- Florida Commits $1 Billion to Climate Resilience. But After Hurricane Ian, Some Question the State’s Development Practices
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- First Republic Bank shares plummet, reigniting fears about U.S. banking sector
- Supreme Court looks at whether Medicare and Medicaid were overbilled under fraud law
- When your boss is an algorithm
Recommendation
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Despite Layoffs, There Are Still Lots Of Jobs Out There. So Where Are They?
Plans To Dig the Biggest Lithium Mine in the US Face Mounting Opposition
Plagued by Daily Blackouts, Puerto Ricans Are Calling for an Energy Revolution. Will the Biden Administration Listen?
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Senate Votes to Ratify the Kigali Amendment, Joining 137 Nations in an Effort to Curb Global Warming
Prince George Enjoys Pizza at Cricket Match With Dad Prince William
When your boss is an algorithm