Current:Home > MyNo need to avoid snoozing: Study shows hitting snooze for short period could have benefits -Capitatum
No need to avoid snoozing: Study shows hitting snooze for short period could have benefits
Algosensey View
Date:2025-04-05 14:32:28
Not ready to start the day? The snooze button is there to give you the few more precious minutes of sleep and new research has found you don't need to feel guilty about it.
A new report published Wednesday in the Journal of Sleep Research found no evidence that using the snooze feature on your alarm negatively impacts sleep and cognitive processes. And while morning drowsiness and shorter sleep were more common in those who snoozed, it could even have benefits if used shortly.
The research even found that a brief snooze period could alleviate sleep inertia, the disorientation and performance or mood decline that occurs when waking up, without drastically disturbing sleep. It could also improve one's cognitive functioning compared to completely waking up after the first alarm goes off.
"The findings indicate that there is no reason to stop snoozing in the morning if you enjoy it, at least not for snooze times around 30 minutes. In fact, it may even help those with morning drowsiness to be slightly more awake once they get up," said corresponding author Tina Sundelin of Stockholm University said in a news release.
Sleep study:Night owls are more likely to develop diabetes than early birds, new research shows
The research was based off two studies with the first observing the waking habits of 1,732 adults. Most of the adults (69%) reported using an alarms snooze feature or occasionally setting multiple alarms. Snoozing ranged from 1 to 180 minutes, according to the study, with the average period being 22 minutes per morning.
The second study analyzed 31 confirmed regular snoozers and found that for every 30 minutes they snoozed, they lost six minutes of sleep – for a net gain of 24 minutes. However, researchers did not find any clear effects of mood, stress, tiredness, hormone levels or overnight sleep quality.
Most snoozers are younger and not morning people
The report also found people who snooze tended to at least six years younger than those who don't. Research also found that those who identified as night types were almost four times more likely to snooze than morning people.
"Snoozers also had a slightly shorter sleep duration on workdays, 13 min less on average, compared to those who never snooze," the report said.
The nose knows:Why does COVID-19 usually hit adults so much harder than kids?
Poor sleep patterns are still harmful
Despite these studies finding that a certain amount of snooze won't damager your health, it remains crucial to get enough consistent sleep to avoid serious health consequences.
Reaching the recommended sleep duration of seven to eight hours can add years to one's life, according to research from the American College of Cardiology published in February. The research said poor sleep patterns can be attributed to 8% of deaths.
According to the CDC, more than a third of Americans fail to get enough consistent sleep.
veryGood! (4119)
Related
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- ERs staffed by private equity firms aim to cut costs by hiring fewer doctors
- Amazon will send workers back to the office under a hybrid work model
- United Airlines will no longer charge families extra to sit together on flights
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- More than 300,000 bottles of Starbucks bottled Frappuccinos have been recalled
- Sarah Jessica Parker Teases Carrie & Aidan’s “Rich Relationship” in And Just Like That Season 2
- Avalanche of evidence: How a Chevy, a strand of hair and a pizza box led police to the Gilgo Beach suspect
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- 'New York Times' stories on trans youth slammed by writers — including some of its own
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Inside Clean Energy: Four Charts Tell the Story of the Post-Covid Energy Transition
- Is the Controlled Shrinking of Economies a Better Bet to Slow Climate Change Than Unproven Technologies?
- Bachelor Fans Will Want to Steal Jason Tartick and Kaitlyn Bristowe's Date Night Ideas for a Sec
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Hybrid cars are still incredibly popular, but are they good for the environment?
- Federal Trade Commission's request to pause Microsoft's $69 billion takeover of Activision during appeal denied by judge
- Amazon Prime Day Is Starting Early With This Unreal Deal on the Insignia Fire TV With 5,500+ Rave Reviews
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Save 56% on an HP Laptop and Get 1 Year of Microsoft Office and Wireless Mouse for Free
Hybrid cars are still incredibly popular, but are they good for the environment?
Maluma Is Officially a Silver Fox With New Salt and Pepper Hairstyle
San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
Coal Phase-Down Has Lowered, Not Eliminated Health Risks From Building Energy, Study Says
Coal Phase-Down Has Lowered, Not Eliminated Health Risks From Building Energy, Study Says
Super Bowl commercials, from Adam Driver(s) to M&M candies; the hits and the misses