Current:Home > ContactJudge rules Michigan lawmakers violated open meetings law during debate on gun control legislation -Capitatum
Judge rules Michigan lawmakers violated open meetings law during debate on gun control legislation
View
Date:2025-04-14 00:39:01
DETROIT (AP) — A judge has ruled that Michigan lawmakers violated the state’s open meetings laws during public hearings on gun control legislation.
Court of Claims Judge Robert Redford ruled Thursday that the House of Representatives violated the Open Meetings Act by limiting testimony during committee hearings on the bills this past spring, the Detroit Free Press reported.
The legislation expands background checks, implements so-called red-flag laws, which allow judges to temporarily confiscate a firearm from an individual, and imposes safe storage requirements on guns in homes where children are present. The laws are set to go into effect Feb. 13, exactly a year after a gunman opened fire at Michigan State University, killing three students and injuring five others.
Committees in both the House and Senate heard mostly from the legislation’s supporters during hearings in March and April. Speakers from Great Lakes Gun Rights and Michigan Open Carry were allowed to submit cards in opposition but were not allowed to speak during a House committee hearing on the red-flag bills. Lawmakers said they were under a time constraint.
The Open Meetings Act requires public bodies to make meetings and actions accessible to the public. Under the act, entities must make time for members of the public who attend meetings to speak, although they can impose time limitations.
Great Lakes Gun Rights and Michigan Open Carry filed a lawsuit in April asking a judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the laws, arguing lawmakers violated the Open Meetings Act by not allowing balanced testimony during committee hearings on the bills.
Redford, the judge, declined to enter an injunction to bring the House into compliance with the act, saying lawmakers can determine the rules of their own proceedings. He said in his decision there was no indication the Senate violated the act.
veryGood! (96)
Related
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Trump’s EPA Skipped Ethics Reviews for Several New Advisers, Government Watchdog Finds
- How a Texas court decision threatens Affordable Care Act protections
- 2016: When Climate Activists Aim to Halt Federal Coal Leases
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- This city is the most appealing among aspiring Gen Z homeowners
- King Charles III and Queen Camilla Officially Crowned at Coronation
- Family Dollar recalls Colgate products that were improperly stored
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Here’s How You Can Get $120 Worth of Olaplex Hair Products for Just $47
Ranking
- In ‘Nickel Boys,’ striving for a new way to see
- Today’s Climate: June 12-13, 2010
- There's a global call for kangaroo care. Here's what it looks like in the Ivory Coast
- Thawing Arctic Permafrost Hides a Toxic Risk: Mercury, in Massive Amounts
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- Earthquakes at Wastewater Injection Site Give Oklahomans Jolt into New Year
- Today’s Climate: June 19-20, 2010
- California Declares State of Emergency as Leak Becomes Methane Equivalent of Deepwater Horizon
Recommendation
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Is California’s Drought Returning? Snowpack Nears 2015’s Historic Lows
Today’s Climate: June 15, 2010
Here’s How You Can Get $120 Worth of Olaplex Hair Products for Just $47
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
Today’s Climate: June 16, 2010
Today’s Climate: June 10, 2010
Wehrum Resigns from EPA, Leaving Climate Rule Rollbacks in His Wake