Current:Home > NewsA federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court -Capitatum
A federal judge again declares that DACA is illegal. Issue likely to be decided by US Supreme Court
Ethermac Exchange View
Date:2025-04-06 00:29:12
HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Wednesday declared illegal a revised version of a federal policy that prevents the deportation of hundreds of thousands of immigrants brought to the U.S. as children.
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen agreed with Texas and eight other states suing to stop the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program. The judge’s ruling was ultimately expected to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, sending the program’s fate before the high court for a third time.
Hanen barred the government from approving any new applications, but left the program intact for existing recipients during the expected appeals process. Hanen said his order does not require the federal government to take any actions against DACA recipients.
The states have argued the Obama administration didn’t have the authority to first create the program in 2012 because it circumvented Congress.
In 2021, Hanen had declared the program illegal, ruling it had not been subject to public notice and comment periods required under the federal Administrative Procedures Act.
The Biden administration tried to satisfy Hanen’s concerns with a new version of DACA that took effect in October 2022 and was subject to public comments as part of a formal rule-making process.
But Hanen, who was appointed by then-President George W. Bush in 2002, ruled the updated version of DACA was still illegal. He had previously said DACA was unconstitutional and it would be up to Congress to enact legislation shielding people under the program, often known as “Dreamers.”
Hanen also had previously ruled the states had standing to file their lawsuit because they had been harmed by the program.
The states have claimed they incur hundreds of millions of dollars in health care, education and other costs when immigrants are allowed to remain in the country illegally. The states that sued are Texas, Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, West Virginia, Kansas and Mississippi.
Those defending the program — the federal government, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the state of New Jersey — had argued the states failed to present evidence that any of the costs they allege they have incurred have been tied to DACA recipients. They also argued Congress has given the Department of Homeland Security the legal authority to set immigration enforcement policies.
Despite previously declaring the DACA program illegal, Hanen had left the Obama-era program intact for those already benefiting from it. But he had ruled there could be no new applicants while appeals were pending.
There were 578,680 people enrolled in DACA at the end of March, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The program has faced a roller coaster of court challenges over the years.
In 2016, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA, allowing it to stay in place.
In 2022, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld Hanen’s earlier ruling declaring DACA illegal, but sent the case back to him to review changes made to the program by the Biden administration.
President Joe Biden and advocacy groups have called on Congress to pass permanent protections for “ dreamers.” Congress has failed multiple times to pass proposals called the DREAM Act to protect DACA recipients.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Drivers would pay $15 to enter busiest part of NYC under plan to raise funds for mass transit
- MLB great Andre Dawson wants to switch his hat from Expos to Cubs on Hall of Fame plaque
- Mark Wahlberg’s Wife Rhea Posts Spicy Photo of Actor in His Underwear
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Latest hospital cyberattack shows how health care systems' vulnerability can put patients at risk
- Millions of seniors struggle to afford housing — and it's about to get a lot worse
- Many Americans have bipolar disorder. Understand the cause, treatment of this condition.
- McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
- Many Americans have bipolar disorder. Understand the cause, treatment of this condition.
Ranking
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele requests leave to campaign for reelection
- 'Here we go!': Why Cowboys' Dak Prescott uses unique snap cadence
- Florida’s GOP chairman is a subject in a rape investigation
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Iowa Lottery posted wrong Powerball numbers — but temporary winners get to keep the money
- 3 die in Maine when car goes in wrong direction on turnpike, hitting 2 vehicles
- Government watchdog launches probe into new FBI headquarters site selection
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
Beyoncé and Taylor Swift Prove They Run the World at Renaissance Film Premiere in London
City Council in Portland, Oregon, approves $2.6M for police body cameras
Detroit touts country's first wireless-charging public road for electric vehicles
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
Veterinarians say fears about 'mystery' dog illness may be overblown. Here's why
'May December' shines a glaring light on a dark tabloid story
Best picture before bedtime? Oscars announces earlier start time for 2024 ceremony